Skilled nursing facilities · Alabama

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Cahaba River

Vestavia, AL · ~137 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Cahaba River runs at 211% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Cahaba River: 13.7 TCR = 211% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Cahaba River safety composite

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Cahaba River scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 39.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Cahaba River: 5.0 → 40.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 40.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2.85× in 2020

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Cahaba River's TCR rose 35.5 from 5.0 in 2016 to 40.5 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 2.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Vestavia, AL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.7 · 211% of ind

  • DART 39.1 DART
  • RANK #222/269
  • PHOTO Stonerise Parkersburg
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~137 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stonerise Parkersburg (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Cahaba River in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Cahaba River averages 13.7 TCR (211% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Cahaba River TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=9.5 · 2018=8.1 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=40.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Cahaba River falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #222 safest of 269 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Alabama.

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Cahaba River (137 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Cahaba River
Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Cahaba River (137 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Cahaba River has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 40.5 39.1 9 46 0
2019 5.6 3.5 8 0 0
2018 8.1 4.7 12 0 0
2017 9.5 4.3 11 0 0
2016 5.0 5.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · AL · Vestavia

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 9 employers in Vestavia, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stonerise Parkersburg 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Juan Center 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9288-4 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Little Flower Manor of the Diocese of Scranton 13.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hoar Program Management, LLC 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fulton Sawmill 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nucor Tubular Products - Trinity 137 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Ford Meter Box Company, Inc. (Pell City) 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Office 375 FTE
CITY-NEAR Longleaf Liberty Park 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR BHAM DIRECT DELIVERY LLC 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR 010794-BHM-CAHABA HEIGHTS BR 59 FTE
NAT-TCR San Juan Center 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Forest 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR WB Powell 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR DEN-DENVER 13.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE MacGregor Downs Health and Rehabilitation Center 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : ATG 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE West DuPage Recycling & Transfer 137 FTE
NAT-SIZE 266368-Eagan Solutions Center 137 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.