Skilled Nursing Facility · Alabama

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Hoover, LLC

Hoover, AL · ~167 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Hoover, LLC runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled Nursing Facility workplace, earning a grade C.

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Hoover, LLC: 5.6 TCR = 87% of Skilled Nursing Facility BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Hoover, LLC safety composite

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Hoover, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2021→2024

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Hoover, LLC injury rate improved

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Hoover, LLC's TCR fell 1.0 from 6.2 in 2021 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=6.2 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Hoover, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.6 · 87% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #98/269
  • PHOTO LP Horse Cave, LLC (…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~167 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LP Horse Cave, LLC (Hart Co) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Hoover, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Hoover, LLC averages 5.6 TCR (87% of the Skilled Nursing Facility BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Hoover, LLC TCR series: 2021=6.2 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=5.2 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Hoover, LLC falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled Nursing Facility establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #98 safest of 269 Skilled Nursing Facility employers in Alabama.

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Hoover, LLC (167 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Hoover, LLC
Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Hoover, LLC (167 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Aspire Physical Recovery Center at Hoover, LLC has more employees than the Skilled Nursing Facility median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 2.2 7 0 0
2023 5.2 2.9 7 0 0
2022 6.1 3.0 8 0 0
2021 6.2 3.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · AL · Hoover

15,252 Skilled Nursing Facility employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 82 employers in Hoover, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LP Horse Cave, LLC (Hart Co) 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evergreen Main 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kei-Ai Los Angeles Healthcare Center 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jefferson Manor 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Birmingham Corporate Headquarters 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rob't J. Baggett, Inc. 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cumberland Plastic Systems LLC 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE King Kutter 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR BRHMALDC 858 FTE
CITY-NEAR BRHMALDC - AT&T Mobility Services LLC 712 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1229 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2111 344 FTE
NAT-TCR EDM, Inc 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bartlett Park District 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cal-Tex Electric, Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Medford Nursing Center 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Worthington Steel Porter 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairburn Plant 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE College Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nasoya Foods USA, LLC 167 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.