Homes for the elderly with nursing care · New Hampshire

Assisted Living Facility

Portsmouth, NH · ~68 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Assisted Living Facility runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade C.

Assisted Living Facility: 5.9 TCR = 91% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Assisted Living Facility safety composite

Assisted Living Facility scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−112.7

2016→2024

Assisted Living Facility injury rate improved

Assisted Living Facility's TCR fell 112.7 from 112.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 112.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=112.7 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=19.7 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Portsmouth, NH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.9 · 91% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/106
  • PHOTO Presbyterian Home fo…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Presbyterian Home for Central New York, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

Assisted Living Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Assisted Living Facility averages 5.9 TCR (91% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Assisted Living Facility TCR series: 2016=112.7 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=19.7 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Assisted Living Facility falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 106 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in New Hampshire.

Assisted Living Facility (68 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Assisted Living Facility
Assisted Living Facility (68 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Assisted Living Facility has fewer employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.7 0.0 2 0 0
2022 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2021 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2020 19.7 17.9 3 8 0
2019 7.3 7.3 4 0 0
2018 5.1 3.4 3 0 0
2016 112.7 16.1 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NH · Portsmouth

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 119 employers in Portsmouth, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Presbyterian Home for Central New York, Inc. 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Ministries Gerry Homes Retirement Campus 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Third Ave Health and Rehab 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63227 SUNRISE OF SILVER SPRING 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brentwood 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Builders Installed Products New Hampshire 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gates Mectrol Salem 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE QUIKRETE - BOS 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lonza Portsmouth 1,182 FTE
CITY-NEAR Portsmouth Regional Hospital 1,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR LDRM Visa Support Services NVC-DTSV 339 FTE
CITY-NEAR LDRM Visa Support Services NVC-LWH 330 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookwood Medical Center 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ohno Construction Company 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Desert Ridge 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wyndemere 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE STS Cable Services Inc 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE AGP Aberdeen Soy 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lowrie Electric Company, Inc. 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cypress 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.