Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Nebraska

Assisted Living/Independent Living

Columbus, NE · ~40 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Assisted Living/Independent Living runs at 281% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Assisted Living/Independent Living: 10.7 TCR = 281% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Assisted Living/Independent Living safety composite

Assisted Living/Independent Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.4

2022→2024

Assisted Living/Independent Living injury rate improved

Assisted Living/Independent Living's TCR fell 9.4 from 13.3 in 2022 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 14.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=13.3 · 2023=14.9 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Columbus, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.7 · 281% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #49/66
  • PHOTO The Enclave of Frank…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Enclave of Franklin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Assisted Living/Independent Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Assisted Living/Independent Living averages 10.7 TCR (281% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Assisted Living/Independent Living TCR series: 2022=13.3 · 2023=14.9 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Assisted Living/Independent Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 66 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Nebraska.

Assisted Living/Independent Living (40 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Assisted Living/Independent Living
Assisted Living/Independent Living (40 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Assisted Living/Independent Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 14.9 7.5 4 0 0
2022 13.3 0.0 1 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NE · Columbus

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 91 employers in Columbus, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Enclave of Franklin 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clovis Senior Living LLC 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hudson Care and Rehab Center 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bridgeville, Elmcroft of 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Frenchman Valley Produce, Inc. 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE CSS Farms, LLC Columbus, NE 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olson Farms 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cheever Construction 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD Columbus West 1,148 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD Pharmaceutical Systems 971 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus Community Hospital 833 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD Columbus East 762 FTE
NAT-TCR Green Forest Wood Products LLC 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Better Logistics Inc. 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Nicollet County Public Works 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Enclave of Franklin 10.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ardent Mills Tampa 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Onodi Tool & Engineering Company 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Park Nissan 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neighborhood Improvement/Planning 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.