Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system · Indiana

Astbury Water Technology, Inc.

Indianapolis, IN · ~78 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Astbury Water Technology, Inc. runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade D.

Astbury Water Technology, Inc.: 1.6 TCR = 131% of Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Astbury Water Technology, Inc. safety composite

Astbury Water Technology, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Astbury Water Technology, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Astbury Water Technology, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.6 · 131% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/9
  • PHOTO Milwaukee Jones Island
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Milwaukee Jones Island (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Astbury Water Technology, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Astbury Water Technology, Inc. averages 1.6 TCR (131% of the Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Astbury Water Technology, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Astbury Water Technology, Inc. falls in its industry

400 Waste collection, treatment, a establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 9 Waste collection, treatment, a employers in Indiana.

Astbury Water Technology, Inc. (78 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Astbury Water Technology, Inc.
Astbury Water Technology, Inc. (78 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Astbury Water Technology, Inc. has more employees than the Waste collection, treatment, and disposa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.5 4.5 3 0 0
2021 3.0 1.5 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.5 1.8 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · IN · Indianapolis

400 Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Milwaukee Jones Island 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Upper Occoquan Service Authority 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alexandria Renew Enterprises 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR H2O innovation Operation & Maintenance LLC - Pascagoula O&M 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE White County Egg Farm 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4391_9545 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kleenco Maintenance & Construction, Inc. 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aquatic Renovation Systems 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Tri-Technologies Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cohoes Paper Machine 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ODC Network 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Vi-Jon, LLC Smyrna TN 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lenoir HealthCare Center 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rinaudo Enterprises Inc 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE AZZ Galvanizing - Canton 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE AZZ Galvanizing - Houston West 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.