Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · California

Astro Seal Inc.

Riverside, CA · ~21 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Astro Seal Inc. runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Astro Seal Inc.: 2.9 TCR = 86% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Astro Seal Inc. safety composite

Astro Seal Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2017→2022

Astro Seal Inc. injury rate improved

Astro Seal Inc.'s TCR fell 5.0 from 5.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=12.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Riverside, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 86% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/29
  • PHOTO Molex West Bond
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Molex West Bond (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Astro Seal Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Astro Seal Inc. averages 2.9 TCR (86% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Astro Seal Inc. TCR series: 2017=5 · 2018=0 · 2019=12.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Astro Seal Inc. falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 29 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in California.

Astro Seal Inc. (21 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Astro Seal Inc.
Astro Seal Inc. (21 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Astro Seal Inc. has fewer employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 12.1 12.1 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · CA · Riverside

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 536 employers in Riverside, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Molex West Bond 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amphenol Borisch Technologies, Mesa, AZ 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trek 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR RF&M - Peabody 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Poso Ridge,LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fonseca & Fonseca, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELESIS ONION CO., INC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayflower Farms Inc 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Riverside 8,676 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-21 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Community Hospital 2,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08681351 RIVERSIDE MED CENTER 2,349 FTE
NAT-TCR Chelan 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Eastern LA Mental Health 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Renton 47440 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Manheim Fredericksburg 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE APL Logistics Ringgold 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gateway Printing & Office Supply, Inc.- Corpus Christi, TX Location 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Desert Fasteners & Supply 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fox Run Estates 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.