Guided missile and space vehicle parts (except engines) manufacturing · California

ATK Space Systems Inc - San Diego

San Diego, CA · ~495 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ATK Space Systems Inc - San Diego runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Guided missile and space vehicle parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

ATK Space Systems Inc - San Diego: 1.4 TCR = 44% of Guided missile and space vehicle parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ATK Space Systems Inc - San Diego safety composite

ATK Space Systems Inc - San Diego scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ATK Space Systems Inc - San Diego: 0.8 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.6 TCR · DART/TCR 2.5× in 2022

ATK Space Systems Inc - San Diego's TCR rose 2.8 from 0.8 in 2018 to 3.6 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 2.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336419 · San Diego, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 44% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO Kaman Aerospace Group
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~495 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kaman Aerospace Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

ATK Space Systems Inc - San Diego in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ATK Space Systems Inc - San Diego averages 1.4 TCR (44% of the Guided missile and space vehicle parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ATK Space Systems Inc - San Diego TCR series: 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.9 · 2022=3.6 · BLS 3.3

Where ATK Space Systems Inc - San Diego falls in its industry

41 Guided missile and space vehic establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 Guided missile and space vehic employers in California.

ATK Space Systems Inc - San Diego (495 employees, TCR 1.4) among 20 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 193 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate ATK Space Systems Inc - San Diego
ATK Space Systems Inc - San Diego (495 employees, TCR 1.4) among 20 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 193 employees and a TCR of 1.1

ATK Space Systems Inc - San Diego has more employees than the Guided missile and space vehicle parts ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.6 3.6 6 15 0
2020 0.9 0.5 4 0 0
2019 0.5 0.5 2 0 0
2018 0.8 0.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336419 · CA · San Diego

41 Guided missile and space vehicle parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kaman Aerospace Group 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raytheon_Farmington_NM_Dine 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US CA Ventura Golf Course Dr (1063) 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beyond Gravity Trinity 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE REYES AG ENTERPRISE, INC. 495 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nihon Kohden America llc 495 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1862 495 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMZL : DPS3 495 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR Elizabeth, NJ - West 3rd St 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Associated Clinic of Psychology, Inc. - 4240 Park Glen 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR YMCA Fairfax County in Reston 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0364 Tyson Foods Inc. - Sherman 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bay Park Hospital 495 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wal-Mart Regional Sales Office 495 FTE
NAT-SIZE TAMVFL04 495 FTE
NAT-SIZE DAK Americas, LLC-Columbia Site 495 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.