Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors · Georgia

Atlanta

College Park, GA · ~44 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Atlanta runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Atlanta: 2.6 TCR = 92% of Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Atlanta safety composite

Atlanta scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2016→2024

Atlanta injury rate improved

Atlanta's TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 12.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.5 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=12.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · College Park, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 92% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #85/131
  • PHOTO B and D Electrical, LP
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: B and D Electrical, LP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Atlanta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Atlanta averages 2.6 TCR (92% of the Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Atlanta TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=12 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Atlanta falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical Contractors and Oth establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #85 safest of 131 Electrical Contractors and Oth employers in Georgia.

Atlanta (44 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Atlanta
Atlanta (44 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Atlanta has fewer employees than the Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 12.0 7.2 5 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2020 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2019 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2018 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2017 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2016 2.5 1.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · GA · College Park

4,550 Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 75 employers in College Park, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR B and D Electrical, LP 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kaiser Electric of Central Missouri 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR HM Cragg 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fulfillment - McKeesport 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 04564100-00W002 LOCAL BOUNTI CORPORATION-LOCAL BOUNTI CORPORATION 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Duluth Operating - 3825 Rogers Bridge Rd. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Albany Operating/TMC - 101 Georgia Power Rd. Albany, GA 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gainesboro Operating 2293 Skelton Rd Gainesville 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR COLLEGE PARK 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Atlanta 1,228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Golden Gate America East LLC. 954 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sysco Atlanta 811 FTE
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #1664 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AL207 Naheola Paper 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NWTL 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR PACE Supply Medford Branch 33 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE OR014 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Germantown Iron & Steel 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hermann 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE N.E.W. Plastics Corp - Renew Luxemburg 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.