Warehousing and storage, general merchandise · Georgia

Atlanta Consolidated Warehouse - ACW

Austell, GA · ~28 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Atlanta Consolidated Warehouse - ACW runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade C.

Atlanta Consolidated Warehouse - ACW: 5.0 TCR = 86% of Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Atlanta Consolidated Warehouse - ACW safety composite

Atlanta Consolidated Warehouse - ACW scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Atlanta Consolidated Warehouse - ACW: 0.0 → 5.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 11.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.06× in 2024

Atlanta Consolidated Warehouse - ACW's TCR rose 5.3 from 0.0 in 2018 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 11.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Austell, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.0 · 86% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #394/506
  • PHOTO KYSPL - SHEPHERDSVIL…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KYSPL - SHEPHERDSVILLE DIST CTR 10360 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Atlanta Consolidated Warehouse - ACW in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Atlanta Consolidated Warehouse - ACW averages 5.0 TCR (86% of the Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Atlanta Consolidated Warehouse - ACW TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=7.5 · 2021=11.8 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 5.8

Where Atlanta Consolidated Warehouse - ACW falls in its industry

9,477 Warehousing and storage, gener establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #394 safest of 506 Warehousing and storage, gener employers in Georgia.

Atlanta Consolidated Warehouse - ACW (28 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Atlanta Consolidated Warehouse - ACW
Atlanta Consolidated Warehouse - ACW (28 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Atlanta Consolidated Warehouse - ACW has fewer employees than the Warehousing and storage, general merchan median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 5.3 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.2 3.6 2 0 0
2021 11.8 7.8 3 0 0
2020 7.5 7.5 2 0 0
2019 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · GA · Austell

9,477 Warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 113 employers in Austell, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KYSPL - SHEPHERDSVILLE DIST CTR 10360 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx Supply Chain - Cryl Bethlehem 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR True Value Harvard RDC 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMZL : DIL1 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services Blackshear AEP 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Waelder, TX 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hatchery 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Georgia Forest Products, Inc 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellStar Cobb Hospital 2,856 FTE
CITY-NEAR Six Flags Over Georgia 1,044 FTE
CITY-NEAR ATLANTA OPERA WAREHOUSE 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plateau Excavation, Inc 762 FTE
NAT-TCR Ashcraft/European Bakery, L.P. 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AirCare Ambulance 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 39 Brentwood Rd 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Western 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pascagoula Service Center 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE NC Rental Tukwila 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Secondary Development and Research, Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE SSP-SiMatrix, Inc. - Hamilton 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.