Rigging large-scale equipment · Ohio

Atlas Industrial Contractors

Columbus, OH · ~362 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Atlas Industrial Contractors runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Rigging large-scale equipment workplace, earning a grade B.

Atlas Industrial Contractors: 2.2 TCR = 79% of Rigging large-scale equipment BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Atlas Industrial Contractors safety composite

Atlas Industrial Contractors scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2024

Atlas Industrial Contractors injury rate improved

Atlas Industrial Contractors's TCR fell 0.5 from 1.6 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.6 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Columbus, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 79% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #37/58
  • PHOTO TK Elevator Detroit
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 72 inj
  • SIZE ~362 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TK Elevator Detroit (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Atlas Industrial Contractors in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Atlas Industrial Contractors averages 2.2 TCR (79% of the Rigging large-scale equipment BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Atlas Industrial Contractors TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=1 · BLS 2.8

Where Atlas Industrial Contractors falls in its industry

1,138 Rigging large-scale equipment establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 58 Rigging large-scale equipment employers in Ohio.

Atlas Industrial Contractors (362 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Atlas Industrial Contractors
Atlas Industrial Contractors (362 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Atlas Industrial Contractors has more employees than the Rigging large-scale equipment median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.7 3 0 0
2023 3.7 2.2 10 0 0
2022 1.9 0.4 5 0 0
2021 2.3 1.4 8 0 0
2020 1.4 0.7 4 0 0
2019 3.3 1.4 12 0 0
2018 2.2 1.5 9 0 0
2017 2.6 1.4 13 0 0
2016 1.6 1.2 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · OH · Columbus

1,138 Rigging large-scale equipment employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TK Elevator Detroit 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR TK Elevator Roanoke 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AND DESIGN 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR RetubeCo, Inc. 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CDK - Norwood 362 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quality Gold, Inc. 362 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1331 362 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2323 362 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR Tolerance Masters, LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Plymouth Tube Co 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR General Butler State Resort Park 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR RLP Diversified Inc 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Costa Delray, LLC 362 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hiva Inc 362 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nichiha USA 362 FTE
NAT-SIZE Novanta Inc. 362 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.