Annealing metals and metal products for the trade · Michigan

Atmosphere Annealing Mt Hope

Name: Atmosphere Annealing Mt Hope Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Lansing, MI · ~38 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 10.3
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Atmosphere Annealing Mt Hope runs at 311% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Annealing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Atmosphere Annealing Mt Hope: 10.3 TCR = 311% of Annealing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Atmosphere Annealing Mt Hope safety composite

Atmosphere Annealing Mt Hope scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 10.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers
DART rate: F 5.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2021→2024

Atmosphere Annealing Mt Hope injury rate improved

Atmosphere Annealing Mt Hope's TCR fell 3.2 from 10.9 in 2021 to 7.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=10.9 · 2022=11.5 · 2023=10.9 · 2024=7.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Lansing, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 311% of ind

DART 5.2 DART
RANK #38/43
PHOTO WWH
BOOK 4y book
INJ 15 inj
SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WWH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

This site

10.3
WWH

10.3
National Peeni

10.3
Dependable Met

10.1
Bodycote Therm

10.1

What this shows Atmosphere Annealing Mt Hope averages 10.3 TCR (311% of the Annealing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Atmosphere Annealing Mt Hope TCR series: 2021=10.9 · 2022=11.5 · 2023=10.9 · 2024=7.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Atmosphere Annealing Mt Hope falls in its industry

248 Annealing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 43 Annealing metals and metal pro employers in Michigan.

Atmosphere Annealing Mt Hope (38 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Atmosphere Annealing Mt Hope has more employees than the Annealing metals and metal products for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2024	7.7	5.2	3
2023	10.9	8.2	4
2022	11.5	11.5	4
2021	10.9	8.2	4

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · MI · Lansing

248 Annealing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 410 employers in Lansing, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	WWH	HOMER, MI	10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	National Peening Wilmington	WILMINGTON, NC	10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Dependable Metal Treating, Inc	KENDALLVILLE, IN	10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc.	BERLIN, CT	10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Westview Orchards	WASHINGTON	38 FTE
STATE-SIZE	C3 Industries, Inc - Webberville (Indoor)	WEBBERVILLE	38 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Great Lakes Packing Co. Kewadin	KEWADIN	38 FTE
STATE-SIZE	McConnell & Scully, Inc.	HOMER	38 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Lansing Delta Township Assembly	Lansing	2,608 FTE
CITY-NEAR	General Motors Lansing Delta Township Assembly	Lansing	2,446 FTE
CITY-NEAR	LCC - Main	Lansing	2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Lansing Grand River Assembly	Lansing	1,648 FTE
NAT-TCR	Broder Bros Co dba Primeline	Bridgeport, CT	10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	5104 - NC Forsyth County	Winston-Salem, NC	10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	West Gate Village, LLC	Brewton, AL	10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	0069 - Valley West	West Des Moines, IA	10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	State of Indiana - Department of Child Services - Knox	Vincennes, IN	38 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Composite Modules Inc	Attleboro, MA	38 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Aprinnova	Leland, NC	38 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Risser's Poultry Handling Services, LLC	Lititz, PA	38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.