Bridge painting · Michigan

Atsalis Brothers Painting

Warren, MI · ~103 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Atsalis Brothers Painting runs at 328% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Bridge painting workplace, earning a grade F.

Atsalis Brothers Painting: 9.2 TCR = 328% of Bridge painting BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Atsalis Brothers Painting safety composite

Atsalis Brothers Painting scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.0

2016→2024

Atsalis Brothers Painting injury rate improved

Atsalis Brothers Painting's TCR fell 6.0 from 9.9 in 2016 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.9 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=11.5 · 2019=12.6 · 2020=12.0 · 2021=11.0 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=7.2 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238320 · Warren, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.2 · 328% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #14/14
  • PHOTO Frank Bevins Painting
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 69 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Frank Bevins Painting (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Atsalis Brothers Painting in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Atsalis Brothers Painting averages 9.2 TCR (328% of the Bridge painting BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Atsalis Brothers Painting TCR series: 2016=9.9 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=11.5 · 2019=12.6 · 2020=12 · 2021=11 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=7.2 · 2024=4 · BLS 2.8

Where Atsalis Brothers Painting falls in its industry

582 Bridge painting establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 14 Bridge painting employers in Michigan.

Atsalis Brothers Painting (103 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Atsalis Brothers Painting
Atsalis Brothers Painting (103 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Atsalis Brothers Painting has more employees than the Bridge painting median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 1.3 3 0 0
2023 7.2 7.2 5 0 0
2022 8.7 1.7 5 0 0
2021 11.0 7.3 6 0 0
2020 12.0 4.0 6 0 0
2019 12.6 10.5 11 1 0
2018 11.5 6.4 16 2 0
2017 5.8 3.5 5 0 0
2016 9.9 9.1 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238320 · MI · Warren

582 Bridge painting employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 290 employers in Warren, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Frank Bevins Painting 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Williams Professional Painting 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spies Painting, Inc. 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Continental Painting, Inc. 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE MKG Norton Shores SC 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy - Canton, MI - Verizon 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE VanLaan Concrete Construction 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bumler Mechanical 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR Warren Technical Center 22,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR GM Global Technical Center 21,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Warren Truck Assembly Plant 3,804 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIDET153 1,903 FTE
NAT-TCR Prime Metals Acquisition, LLC 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dependable Stamping Company 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sanitation - operations 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR United Alloys and Metals Columbus 9.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Silgan Containers Corporate Center Drive 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Autumn Woods Health Campus 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charter Contracting Company LLC 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0090 Phoenix 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.