Highway bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing · Georgia

Augusta Iron & Steel Works

Augusta, GA · ~46 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Augusta Iron & Steel Works runs at 161% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Highway bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Augusta Iron & Steel Works: 5.3 TCR = 161% of Highway bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Augusta Iron & Steel Works safety composite

Augusta Iron & Steel Works scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Augusta Iron & Steel Works: 5.3 → 7.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.1× in 2024

Augusta Iron & Steel Works's TCR rose 2.5 from 5.3 in 2016 to 7.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Augusta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 161% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #34/51
  • PHOTO Nimsgern Steel Corp.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nimsgern Steel Corp. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Augusta Iron & Steel Works in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Augusta Iron & Steel Works averages 5.3 TCR (161% of the Highway bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Augusta Iron & Steel Works TCR series: 2016=5.3 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=6 · 2019=4 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=6.1 · 2024=7.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Augusta Iron & Steel Works falls in its industry

1,491 Highway bridge sections, prefa establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 51 Highway bridge sections, prefa employers in Georgia.

Augusta Iron & Steel Works (46 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Augusta Iron & Steel Works
Augusta Iron & Steel Works (46 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Augusta Iron & Steel Works has fewer employees than the Highway bridge sections, prefabricated m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.8 5.8 3 1 0
2023 6.1 6.1 3 0 0
2022 5.7 5.7 3 0 0
2021 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2020 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2019 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2018 6.0 6.0 3 0 0
2017 5.7 5.7 3 0 0
2016 5.3 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · GA · Augusta

1,491 Highway bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 373 employers in Augusta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nimsgern Steel Corp. 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Logan, UT 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tamer 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Slay Steel, Inc. 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE LITTE CREEK AG, LLC 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vision Stairways and Millwork 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cartersville Operating - 10 & 41 Massell Drive Cartersville 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGLC Riverdale LNG 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR AUGUSTA COKE 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR AUGUSTA FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR AUGUSTA PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR AU Medical Center, Inc. 5,630 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale Robinwood 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Wagner Millwork, LLC 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Rogers 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ukiah Post Acute 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Iron Oak Plumbing, Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gibson County Utility District 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unilock Michigan INC 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Broadmoor 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.