Homes for the aged with nursing care · Minnesota

Augustana Signe Burckhardt Manor

Minneapolis, MN · ~37 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Augustana Signe Burckhardt Manor runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Homes for the aged with nursing care workplace, earning a grade C.

Augustana Signe Burckhardt Manor: 7.8 TCR = 120% of Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Augustana Signe Burckhardt Manor safety composite

Augustana Signe Burckhardt Manor scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2016→2020

Augustana Signe Burckhardt Manor injury rate improved

Augustana Signe Burckhardt Manor's TCR fell 5.8 from 9.7 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.7 · 2017=8.4 · 2018=12.5 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 7.8 · 120% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #202/430
  • PHOTO Clearview Home & Est…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clearview Home & Estates (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Augustana Signe Burckhardt Manor in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Augustana Signe Burckhardt Manor averages 7.8 TCR (120% of the Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Augustana Signe Burckhardt Manor TCR series: 2016=9.7 · 2017=8.4 · 2018=12.5 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=3.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Augustana Signe Burckhardt Manor falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursin establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #202 safest of 430 Homes for the aged with nursin employers in Minnesota.

Augustana Signe Burckhardt Manor (37 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Augustana Signe Burckhardt Manor
Augustana Signe Burckhardt Manor (37 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Augustana Signe Burckhardt Manor has fewer employees than the Homes for the aged with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2019 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2018 12.5 8.3 3 0 0
2017 8.4 8.4 2 0 0
2016 9.7 4.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MN · Minneapolis

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clearview Home & Estates 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wellbrooke of Westfield 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avantara Norton 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Granville Center 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Betaseed Inc - Shakopee 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pals 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supply Support 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Loretto Motherhouse Infirmary 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Pacific MarBrisa Owners Assn. Inc. 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Wakefield Center 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR VISTA DEL SOL- Main West Postacute Care 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Conway 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 683 - Denver Branch 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 560 - Jacksonville-Int Branch 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Utica MC 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.