Distribution of electric power · Missouri

Aurora Office and Service Center

Aurora, MO · ~23 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aurora Office and Service Center runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade D.

Aurora Office and Service Center: 1.9 TCR = 163% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aurora Office and Service Center safety composite

Aurora Office and Service Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Aurora Office and Service Center held a steady TCR band

Aurora Office and Service Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=8.6 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Aurora, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.9 · 163% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #29/127
  • PHOTO MKG Norton Shores SC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MKG Norton Shores SC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Aurora Office and Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aurora Office and Service Center averages 1.9 TCR (163% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aurora Office and Service Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=8.6 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Aurora Office and Service Center falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 127 Distribution of electric power employers in Missouri.

Aurora Office and Service Center (23 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Aurora Office and Service Center
Aurora Office and Service Center (23 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Aurora Office and Service Center has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2017 8.6 4.3 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MO · Aurora

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 19 employers in Aurora, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MKG Norton Shores SC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medical Center Company 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mecklenburg Electric Gretna 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodlawn Svc Ctr 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coon Creek 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Opal-Foods Bird Moving Crew 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carthage Live Ops 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE MO 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 92 241 FTE
CITY-NEAR 92 219 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL AURORA 172 FTE
CITY-NEAR ARCHITECTURAL SYSTEMS INC - Aurora 146 FTE
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Express 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pike Kentucky Statewide Operations 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR A.L.P. Lighting Components, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 310-Charlotte 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stribling Equipment - Texarkana 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stribling Equipment - Tupelo 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schmitt & Company 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE ID Technology-Oakland 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.