General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) · Texas

Austin Aus

Austin, TX · ~37 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Austin Aus runs at 201% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) workplace, earning a grade F.

Austin Aus: 9.0 TCR = 201% of General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Austin Aus safety composite

Austin Aus scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.7

2016→2024

Austin Aus injury rate improved

Austin Aus's TCR fell 11.7 from 16.8 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 17.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.8 · 2017=17.9 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=11.0 · 2021=6.7 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=11.5 · 2024=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 201% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #214/237
  • PHOTO Central Transport - …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Central Transport - 086 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Austin Aus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Austin Aus averages 9.0 TCR (201% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Austin Aus TCR series: 2016=16.8 · 2017=17.9 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=11 · 2021=6.7 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=11.5 · 2024=5.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Austin Aus falls in its industry

3,020 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #214 safest of 237 General freight trucking, long employers in Texas.

Austin Aus (37 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Austin Aus
Austin Aus (37 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Austin Aus has fewer employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.1 2.5 2 0 0
2023 11.5 9.2 5 0 0
2022 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2021 6.7 4.5 3 0 0
2020 11.0 8.2 4 0 0
2019 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2018 5.3 5.3 2 0 0
2017 17.9 11.9 6 0 0
2016 16.8 16.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · TX · Austin

3,020 General freight trucking, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Central Transport - 086 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6284-YR-515 SC 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PLD 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pittsburgh PA FXFE-PIT 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fannin Growing 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bovina Cattle Company 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Skyland Grain, LLC- Spearman Gin 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alura Cogen 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR 22 Thomson 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlantic Tire - Store 14 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Memphis N - 18 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Polygon Tenn St. 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lkq 1140 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ringmasters Mfg 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Munson Services Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Munson Dialysis 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.