Pumping station, water and sewage system, construction · Texas

Austin Engineering Co., Inc.

Austin, TX · ~163 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Austin Engineering Co., Inc. runs at 161% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pumping station, water and sewage system, construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Austin Engineering Co., Inc.: 4.5 TCR = 161% of Pumping station, water and sewage system, construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Austin Engineering Co., Inc. safety composite

Austin Engineering Co., Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2016→2024

Austin Engineering Co., Inc. injury rate improved

Austin Engineering Co., Inc.'s TCR fell 5.2 from 6.5 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.5 · 2017=5.6 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=5.2 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 161% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #154/194
  • PHOTO SMH West
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 56 inj
  • SIZE ~163 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SMH West (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Austin Engineering Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Austin Engineering Co., Inc. averages 4.5 TCR (161% of the Pumping station, water and sewage system, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Austin Engineering Co., Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.5 · 2017=5.6 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=5.2 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Austin Engineering Co., Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Pumping station, water and sew establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #154 safest of 194 Pumping station, water and sew employers in Texas.

Austin Engineering Co., Inc. (163 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Austin Engineering Co., Inc.
Austin Engineering Co., Inc. (163 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Austin Engineering Co., Inc. has more employees than the Pumping station, water and sewage system median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2023 4.7 2.7 7 0 0
2019 5.2 5.2 13 0 0
2018 3.7 3.7 8 0 0
2017 5.6 5.6 12 1 0
2016 6.5 6.5 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · TX · Austin

1,614 Pumping station, water and sewage system, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SMH West 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HRP Construction, Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hydro Resources, Mid-Continent, Austin 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jax Utilities Management, Inc. 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE RiceTec Alvin Research Station 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Freeport LNG Development LP 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oak Grove Steam Electric Station 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pattern Energy Group LP 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Elyria 10165 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Glenn Metalcraft, Inc 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Grob Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Missoula - 4889 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Power One, LLC 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Autovol Inc 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medifast Inc. MDC 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tavo Packaging 163 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.