Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing · Texas

Austin Facility

Austin, TX · ~152 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Austin Facility runs at 125% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Austin Facility: 4.1 TCR = 125% of Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Austin Facility safety composite

Austin Facility scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2016→2019

Austin Facility injury rate improved

Austin Facility's TCR fell 4.7 from 7.2 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.2 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311511 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 125% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #20/27
  • PHOTO DFA FLUID - HUNTINGT…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~152 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DFA FLUID - HUNTINGTON IN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Austin Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Austin Facility averages 4.1 TCR (125% of the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Austin Facility TCR series: 2016=7.2 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Austin Facility falls in its industry

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 27 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin employers in Texas.

Austin Facility (152 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Austin Facility
Austin Facility (152 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Austin Facility has more employees than the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.5 2.5 4 0 0
2018 1.6 1.0 3 0 0
2017 5.3 4.6 8 0 0
2016 7.2 7.2 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311511 · TX · Austin

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DFA FLUID - HUNTINGTON IN 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 752-PL001 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SWY-0045-0045-08403 FAC-08403-BELLEVUE-WA 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DePere Facility 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Burk Royalty Co. LTD 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bosque Disposal Systems LLC 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chase Center 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Civil Mechanical Clute 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Maricopa County 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Edison Road 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dallas Millworks 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR George's Cassville Processing Plant 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goya Foods of Orlando 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Truck Service Inc 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lodge (HY) 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tolstoy Foundation Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 152 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.