VoIP service providers, using client-supplied telecommunications connections · Texas

Austin Office - Ericsson, Inc

Austin, TX · ~233 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Austin Office - Ericsson, Inc runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical VoIP service providers, using client-supplied telecommunications connections workplace, earning a grade A.

Austin Office - Ericsson, Inc: 0.2 TCR = 27% of VoIP service providers, using client-supplied telecommunications connections BLS 0.7 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Austin Office - Ericsson, Inc safety composite

Austin Office - Ericsson, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Austin Office - Ericsson, Inc: 0.0 → 0.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 0.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2024

Austin Office - Ericsson, Inc's TCR rose 0.8 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517919 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #2/7
  • PHOTO Conterra Charlotte
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~233 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Conterra Charlotte (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Austin Office - Ericsson, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Austin Office - Ericsson, Inc averages 0.2 TCR (27% of the VoIP service providers, using client-supplied telecommunications connections BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Austin Office - Ericsson, Inc TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 0.7

Where Austin Office - Ericsson, Inc falls in its industry

28 VoIP service providers, using establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 7 VoIP service providers, using employers in Texas.

Austin Office - Ericsson, Inc (233 employees, TCR 0.2) among 19 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 20 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Austin Office - Ericsson, Inc
Austin Office - Ericsson, Inc (233 employees, TCR 0.2) among 19 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Austin Office - Ericsson, Inc has more employees than the VoIP service providers, using client-sup median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.4 1 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517919 · TX · Austin

28 VoIP service providers, using client-supplied telecommunications connections employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Conterra Charlotte 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ericsson, Inc 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ascom (US) Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conterra Longview 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 7587 Hwy 75 South 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE CC Home Office 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Houston Service Center CP41 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8836-CPChem Sweeny 233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR DonahueFavret Contractors, Inc. 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR National Oilwell Varco, LP 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR All Jackson Locations 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pro Kleen Industrial Services, Inc. - Lancaster 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DFM5 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foodservice Tampa - 0660 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marriott's Cypress Harbour 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE INDUSTRIAL IRON WORKS, INC., dba ADAMS FERTILIZER EQUIPMENT 233 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.