Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite) · Texas

AUSUTXKW - AT&T Mobility Services LLC

Austin, TX · ~560 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AUSUTXKW - AT&T Mobility Services LLC runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite) workplace, earning a grade A.

AUSUTXKW - AT&T Mobility Services LLC: 0.3 TCR = 43% of Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite) BLS 0.7 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AUSUTXKW - AT&T Mobility Services LLC safety composite

AUSUTXKW - AT&T Mobility Services LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

AUSUTXKW - AT&T Mobility Services LLC held a steady TCR band

AUSUTXKW - AT&T Mobility Services LLC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.3 in 2020 to 0.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.3 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517210 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #5/11
  • PHOTO MMPKTNFZ
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~560 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MMPKTNFZ (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

AUSUTXKW - AT&T Mobility Services LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AUSUTXKW - AT&T Mobility Services LLC averages 0.3 TCR (43% of the Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AUSUTXKW - AT&T Mobility Services LLC TCR series: 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0.3 · BLS 0.7

Where AUSUTXKW - AT&T Mobility Services LLC falls in its industry

87 Wireless Telecommunications Ca establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 11 Wireless Telecommunications Ca employers in Texas.

AUSUTXKW - AT&T Mobility Services LLC (560 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 434 employees and a TCR of 0.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate AUSUTXKW - AT&T Mobility Services LLC
AUSUTXKW - AT&T Mobility Services LLC (560 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 434 employees and a TCR of 0.5

AUSUTXKW - AT&T Mobility Services LLC has more employees than the Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (ex median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.3 0.2 2 0 0
2021 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.3 0.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517210 · TX · Austin

87 Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MMPKTNFZ 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR BDTMOHDR 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR OKCAOKHP - AT&T Mobility Services LLC 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TULVOKVX - AT&T Mobility Services LLC 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Wonderful Company 560 FTE
STATE-SIZE Equipment Depot Texas, Inc 560 FTE
STATE-SIZE Labatt San Antonio 560 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4038-1606 560 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Messer Construction - Charlotte, NC 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Transcat- Rochester 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cacs Ca Irvine 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 4390 Covington Container 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE General Mills Operations, LLC. 560 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rummel Construction, Inc. 560 FTE
NAT-SIZE BMO Harris Bank Center 560 FTE
NAT-SIZE Posillico Civil 560 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.