Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · California

Autism Learning Partners SDS

San Diego, CA · ~94 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Autism Learning Partners SDS runs at 141% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade D.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.8
industry benchmark (BLS)
4
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Autism Learning Partners SDS's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.

Injury rate over time

Autism Learning Partners SDS's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.8 industry benchmark.

345678 20222024 3.53.8 Industry benchmarkAutism Learning Partners SDS TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 624120.

Where Autism Learning Partners SDS falls in its industry

1,535 Self-help organizations for di establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #174 safest of 267 Self-help organizations for di employers in California.

Autism Learning Partners SDS has an average TCR of 5.4, which is 141% of the industry average (3.8) for Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities. This is worse than average.

The letter grade is a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA ITA and BLS benchmark data, not an official OSHA rating or safety certification. Full formula and thresholds: Methodology.

Trend analysis for Autism Learning Partners SDS

Between 2022 and 2024, Autism Learning Partners SDS's Total Case Rate improved from 7.2 to 3.5 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 51% decrease across 2 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2024, at a TCR of 3.5, while 2022 saw the highest rate, at 7.2, a spread of 3.7 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.

Summed across those 2 reporting years, Autism Learning Partners SDS recorded 4 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Autism Learning Partners SDS's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 624120 - Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

2 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 170,560 hours worked = 2.35 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Autism Learning Partners SDS (this establishment) 5.37 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg
Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities industry avg 3.80 BLS IIF, NAICS 624120
California state avg (all industries) 5.64 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Autism Learning Partners SDS to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 2.4 2 1 0
2022 7.2 3.6 2 2 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Autism Learning Partners SDS's reported OSHA injury record versus its Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.

  • At 141% of the Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities benchmark, Autism Learning Partners SDS reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Autism Learning Partners SDS's safety grade?
Autism Learning Partners SDS has a safety grade of D (Poor Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 5.4 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.8 for Self-help organizations for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
How many injuries has Autism Learning Partners SDS reported?
Autism Learning Partners SDS has reported 4 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 2 years of OSHA data (2024, 2022). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry and by workforce size within California - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Explore More Safety Data

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.