Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis · Texas

Auto Truck Fort Worth

Fort Worth, TX · ~70 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Auto Truck Fort Worth runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis workplace, earning a grade C.

Auto Truck Fort Worth: 3.8 TCR = 114% of Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Auto Truck Fort Worth safety composite

Auto Truck Fort Worth scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2016→2022

Auto Truck Fort Worth injury rate improved

Auto Truck Fort Worth's TCR fell 4.9 from 4.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.9 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336211 · Fort Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 114% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/26
  • PHOTO Utilimaster- Kansas …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Utilimaster- Kansas City, MO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Auto Truck Fort Worth in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Auto Truck Fort Worth averages 3.8 TCR (114% of the Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Auto Truck Fort Worth TCR series: 2016=4.9 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Auto Truck Fort Worth falls in its industry

470 Truck bodies assembling on pur establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 26 Truck bodies assembling on pur employers in Texas.

Auto Truck Fort Worth (70 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Auto Truck Fort Worth
Auto Truck Fort Worth (70 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Auto Truck Fort Worth has fewer employees than the Truck bodies assembling on purchased cha median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.5 2.7 4 0 0
2020 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2019 5.2 5.2 4 0 0
2018 7.7 3.1 5 0 0
2017 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2016 4.9 3.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336211 · TX · Fort Worth

470 Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Utilimaster- Kansas City, MO 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morgan Truck Body LLC- MGA Rydal 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hackney 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stellar Industries Inc. Garner Plant 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sales-OOS 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Legacy Farms 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE GP 176/GP 178 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Angelo 1214 Gas Plant Rd, San Angelo, TX 76904 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Mckinney Place 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6768-67680052-BEDC 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR ISD 742 Discovery Elementary 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lwh-Trl-Lovelace Women'S Hosp 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE HDP Enterprises, Inc. 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE 11 Syracuse EM 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4598-Rtc Doraville 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meadowview Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.