Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis · Kentucky

Auto Truck Louisville

Simpsonville, KY · ~83 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Auto Truck Louisville runs at 250% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis workplace, earning a grade F.

Auto Truck Louisville: 8.2 TCR = 250% of Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Auto Truck Louisville safety composite

Auto Truck Louisville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2016→2022

Auto Truck Louisville injury rate improved

Auto Truck Louisville's TCR fell 6.6 from 11.7 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.7 · 2017=12.7 · 2018=10.1 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336211 · Simpsonville, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 250% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #9/12
  • PHOTO Henderson Products U…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Henderson Products USC New York (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Auto Truck Louisville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Auto Truck Louisville averages 8.2 TCR (250% of the Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Auto Truck Louisville TCR series: 2016=11.7 · 2017=12.7 · 2018=10.1 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=7.5 · 2022=5.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Auto Truck Louisville falls in its industry

470 Truck bodies assembling on pur establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 12 Truck bodies assembling on pur employers in Kentucky.

Auto Truck Louisville (83 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Auto Truck Louisville
Auto Truck Louisville (83 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Auto Truck Louisville has fewer employees than the Truck bodies assembling on purchased cha median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.1 4.1 5 0 0
2021 7.5 7.5 6 0 0
2020 6.4 4.3 6 0 0
2019 4.3 2.1 4 0 0
2018 10.1 6.7 9 0 0
2017 12.7 9.8 9 0 0
2016 11.7 8.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336211 · KY · Simpsonville

470 Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 8 employers in Simpsonville, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Henderson Products USC New York 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TBEI - Lake Crystal 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ephrata ER and FVS 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MG MOR 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE KU Operations Center- Stone Rd 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Regional Water Resource Agency 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Branscum Construction Co. Inc. 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE 515 N ENGLISH STATION RD 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR F B Purnell Sausage Co., Inc 238 FTE
CITY-NEAR Simpsonville, Kentucky 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR Simpsonville Data Center, DCC, & TCC 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Neff Packaging Solutions 110 FTE
NAT-TCR 056555-Riv-Rubidoux Sta 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 056728-Sbc-Northpark Sta 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 396141-Okc-Westside Anx 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 184393-Iac-Coralville Br 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Auto Truck Colorado Springs 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Culinary Brands 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charlotte Paper 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meier 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.