Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis · New Jersey

Auto Truck New Jersey

Maple Shade, NJ · ~31 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Auto Truck New Jersey runs at 209% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis workplace, earning a grade F.

Auto Truck New Jersey: 6.9 TCR = 209% of Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Auto Truck New Jersey safety composite

Auto Truck New Jersey scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.1

2016→2022

Auto Truck New Jersey injury rate improved

Auto Truck New Jersey's TCR fell 10.1 from 12.6 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 19.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.6 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=19.4 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336211 · Maple Shade, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 209% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO Douglass Truck Bodie…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Douglass Truck Bodies, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Auto Truck New Jersey in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Auto Truck New Jersey averages 6.9 TCR (209% of the Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Auto Truck New Jersey TCR series: 2016=12.6 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=19.4 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Auto Truck New Jersey falls in its industry

470 Truck bodies assembling on pur establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Truck bodies assembling on pur employers in New Jersey.

Auto Truck New Jersey (31 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Auto Truck New Jersey
Auto Truck New Jersey (31 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Auto Truck New Jersey has fewer employees than the Truck bodies assembling on purchased cha median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2020 19.4 6.5 6 0 0
2019 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2018 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2016 12.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336211 · NJ · Maple Shade

470 Truck bodies assembling on purchased chassis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 36 employers in Maple Shade, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Douglass Truck Bodies, Inc. 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Structural Metal Fabricators, INC. 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unicell Body Company, Inc. 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR STAHL/Scott Fetzer Company 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Orsted - Newark 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beacon Construction Services 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Neelam Construction Corp 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spiniello Companies - Livingston 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastern Lift Truck Co.,Inc. 730 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stonhard 603 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stonhard Maple Shade 261 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastern Lift Truck Co., Inc. Br1 228 FTE
NAT-TCR Allegheny Place 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Forms+Surfaces Phoenix 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR AGRIServices of Brunswick - West 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fresca Mexican Foods LLC 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE BMW of Fort Walton Beach 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Poly Vinyl Creations - Corporate 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sojourner Place 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodbourne Place 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.