Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing · South Carolina

Autokiniton Greenville Manufacturing

Fountain Inn, SC · ~194 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Autokiniton Greenville Manufacturing runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Autokiniton Greenville Manufacturing: 1.8 TCR = 34% of Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Autokiniton Greenville Manufacturing safety composite

Autokiniton Greenville Manufacturing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Autokiniton Greenville Manufacturing: 1.6 → 2.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.3× in 2024

Autokiniton Greenville Manufacturing's TCR rose 0.6 from 1.6 in 2022 to 2.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Fountain Inn, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #2/11
  • PHOTO Walker Automation & …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~194 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Walker Automation & Assembly (Challenge Manufacturing-Plant 3) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Autokiniton Greenville Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Autokiniton Greenville Manufacturing averages 1.8 TCR (34% of the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Autokiniton Greenville Manufacturing TCR series: 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 5.4

Where Autokiniton Greenville Manufacturing falls in its industry

510 Job stampings, automotive, met establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 11 Job stampings, automotive, met employers in South Carolina.

Autokiniton Greenville Manufacturing (194 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Autokiniton Greenville Manufacturing
Autokiniton Greenville Manufacturing (194 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Autokiniton Greenville Manufacturing has more employees than the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 0.6 4 0 0
2023 1.7 0.0 3 0 0
2022 1.6 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · SC · Fountain Inn

510 Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 42 employers in Fountain Inn, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Walker Automation & Assembly (Challenge Manufacturing-Plant 3) 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR GM Marion Stamping 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tower International 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stemco 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE MMR Constructors, Inc. - South Carolina Operations 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE ORBIS MES 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-0661 194 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-0358 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bosch Rexroth FniP 957 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC/FniP Fountain Inn 900 FTE
CITY-NEAR AVX Corporation 684 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fountain Inn 655 FTE
NAT-TCR City of White Plains- Public Safety Police 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR OnPoint Building Services LLC 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Jordan Lumber & Supply Inc 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Denny's 7383 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pacific American Fish Co. Inc. 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garciaco Farming Inc 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE Green Hill Inc 194 FTE
NAT-SIZE FreshPoint Connecticut 194 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.