CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services · Washington

Automated Building Controls Specialist

Kirkland, WA · ~35 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Automated Building Controls Specialist runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services workplace, earning a grade C.

Automated Building Controls Specialist: 0.0 TCR = 0% of CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Automated Building Controls Specialist safety composite

Automated Building Controls Specialist scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Automated Building Controls Specialist held a steady TCR band

Automated Building Controls Specialist's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.0 TCR.

2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541512 · Kirkland, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/5
  • PHOTO Hopkinton 228
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hopkinton 228 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Automated Building Controls Specialist in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Automated Building Controls Specialist averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Automated Building Controls Specialist TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Automated Building Controls Specialist falls in its industry

181 CAD (computer-aided design) sy establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 5 CAD (computer-aided design) sy employers in Washington.

Automated Building Controls Specialist (35 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Automated Building Controls Specialist
Automated Building Controls Specialist (35 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3

Automated Building Controls Specialist has fewer employees than the CAD (computer-aided design) systems inte median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541512 · WA · Kirkland

181 CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 110 employers in Kirkland, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hopkinton 228 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US CO Aurora E Steamboat Ave (1666) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southboro 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franklin 55 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Farm Shop 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE BNW Quincy 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Aquaculture Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE F/V Arica 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Hospital Medical Center 4,778 FTE
CITY-NEAR EvergreenHealth 4,731 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Kirkland 778 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kenworth Truck Company - Yarrow Bay 766 FTE
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Raleigh Managed Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE CH Ellis 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Global Logistics Center/Warranty 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE TN - Altria 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Martinsburg Wv (Pes) 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.