Skilled nursing facilities · Indiana

Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre

Wabash, IN · ~66 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre: 8.4 TCR = 129% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre safety composite

Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2018→2021

Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre injury rate improved

Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre's TCR fell 3.0 from 8.9 in 2018 to 5.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 13.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=8.9 · 2019=13.2 · 2020=5.7 · 2021=5.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Wabash, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.4 · 129% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #426/640
  • PHOTO HEATHER MANOR NURSIN…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HEATHER MANOR NURSING AND REHAB CENTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre averages 8.4 TCR (129% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre TCR series: 2018=8.9 · 2019=13.2 · 2020=5.7 · 2021=5.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #426 safest of 640 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Indiana.

Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre (66 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre
Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre (66 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.9 1.9 3 0 0
2020 5.7 3.8 3 0 0
2019 13.2 9.4 7 0 0
2018 8.9 7.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · IN · Wabash

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 49 employers in Wabash, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HEATHER MANOR NURSING AND REHAB CENTER 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Centinela Skilled Nursing Center 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Actors Fund Home 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wellsprings of Phoenix LLC 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Terre Haute Operations Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE AES Indiana (T&D) - Arlington Service Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE 573-NiSource-Angola IN-Operating HQ 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huntington 04 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Ford Meter Box Company, Inc. 685 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Ford Meter Box Company, Inc. (Wabash) 581 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1667 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR White's Residential and Family Services 274 FTE
NAT-TCR First Farmers/Savannah Location 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Eden Medical Center (207-EMC) 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Primrose Springfield 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mountain View Health & Rehab 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Riceland Foods Incorporated, New Madrid 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE PIDC Ann Arbor 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE MEM 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Centennial Corporate Office 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.