Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Oregon

Avamere Rehab of Oregon City

Oregon City, OR · ~85 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
29.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Avamere Rehab of Oregon City runs at 446% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade F.

Avamere Rehab of Oregon City: 29.0 TCR = 446% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Avamere Rehab of Oregon City safety composite

Avamere Rehab of Oregon City scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 28.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−37.4

2017→2018

Avamere Rehab of Oregon City injury rate improved

Avamere Rehab of Oregon City's TCR fell 37.4 from 47.6 in 2017 to 10.3 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 47.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=47.6 · 2018=10.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Oregon City, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 29.0 · 446% of ind

  • DART 7.7 DART
  • RANK #125/125
  • PHOTO Shady Rest Care Center
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shady Rest Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Avamere Rehab of Oregon City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Avamere Rehab of Oregon City averages 29.0 TCR (446% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Avamere Rehab of Oregon City TCR series: 2017=47.6 · 2018=10.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Avamere Rehab of Oregon City falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #125 safest of 125 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Oregon.

Avamere Rehab of Oregon City (85 employees, TCR 29.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Avamere Rehab of Oregon City
Avamere Rehab of Oregon City (85 employees, TCR 29.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Avamere Rehab of Oregon City has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 10.3 7.7 8 0 0
2017 47.6 47.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OR · Oregon City

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 64 employers in Oregon City, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shady Rest Care Center 29.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brushy Creek Post Acute 29.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Webster Healthcare Center 28.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9288-851 28.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fernhill Holly Farms 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Multnomah County Bldg 425/Yeon Bldg 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Bend - Street, Fleet & Facilities 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE DG3, Inc. dba Dallas Glass 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clackamas County 2,454 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clackamas Community College 840 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR278 PROVIDENCE WILLAMETTE FALLS MEDICAL CTR 752 FTE
CITY-NEAR 701-00242 384 FTE
NAT-TCR Nordic Partners Inc 29.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Capitol Waste Services Inc. 29.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MGM Brakes - Cloverdale 29.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Brushy Creek Post Acute 29.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Hanover College-Admin 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plainville Community Schools Toffolon Elementary School 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant 6D 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE MB-Indy 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.