Hydroelectric power generation · Washington

Avista Generation Control Center

Spokane, WA · ~22 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Avista Generation Control Center runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Hydroelectric power generation workplace, earning a grade A.

Avista Generation Control Center: 0.5 TCR = 42% of Hydroelectric power generation BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Avista Generation Control Center safety composite

Avista Generation Control Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Avista Generation Control Center held a steady TCR band

Avista Generation Control Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=4.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221111 · Spokane, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/25
  • PHOTO CTC Building (Locati…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CTC Building (Location) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Avista Generation Control Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Avista Generation Control Center averages 0.5 TCR (42% of the Hydroelectric power generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Avista Generation Control Center TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Avista Generation Control Center falls in its industry

129 Hydroelectric power generation establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 25 Hydroelectric power generation employers in Washington.

Avista Generation Control Center (22 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Avista Generation Control Center
Avista Generation Control Center (22 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Avista Generation Control Center has fewer employees than the Hydroelectric power generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221111 · WA · Spokane

129 Hydroelectric power generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 551 employers in Spokane, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CTC Building (Location) 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR RG&E East Ave 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant Victor Daniel MPC1820 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wenatchee HQ-Main (Location) 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE A&K Orchards Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MLDCN-MLDIV-CONNELL CATTLE FEEDERS 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gulf Mist, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE ITC Services- Pasco 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000345 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA642 SACRED HEART MEDICAL CENTER-SPOKANE HR 5,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - GEG1 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Spokane 2,451 FTE
NAT-TCR Stealth Construction 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Kimball Electronics 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Florida Lemark Corporation 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Federal Reserve Bank Of Philadelphia 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE ABF Freight 027 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABF Freight 115 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABF Freight 321 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avista Sandpoint 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.