Homes for the elderly with nursing care · Florida

Aviva A Campus for Senior Life

Sarasota, FL · ~205 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Aviva A Campus for Senior Life runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Aviva A Campus for Senior Life: 8.5 TCR = 131% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Aviva A Campus for Senior Life safety composite

Aviva A Campus for Senior Life scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2016→2019

Aviva A Campus for Senior Life injury rate improved

Aviva A Campus for Senior Life's TCR fell 6.6 from 11.9 in 2016 to 5.4 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.9 · 2017=10.2 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Sarasota, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.5 · 131% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #647/809
  • PHOTO Palm Garden of Sun C…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~205 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Palm Garden of Sun City Center, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Aviva A Campus for Senior Life in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Aviva A Campus for Senior Life averages 8.5 TCR (131% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Aviva A Campus for Senior Life TCR series: 2016=11.9 · 2017=10.2 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=5.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Aviva A Campus for Senior Life falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #647 safest of 809 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in Florida.

Aviva A Campus for Senior Life (205 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Aviva A Campus for Senior Life
Aviva A Campus for Senior Life (205 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Aviva A Campus for Senior Life has more employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 5.4 3.0 6 3 0
2018 6.5 4.8 11 0 0
2017 10.2 1.0 10 0 0
2016 11.9 5.0 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · FL · Sarasota

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 504 employers in Sarasota, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Palm Garden of Sun City Center, LLC 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walkers Trail 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seacrest Operator 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midway Neurological & Rehabilitation Center 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Carousel Development & Restoration Inc 205 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miami Plant-Distribution center 205 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4507 Seminole Mill 205 FTE
STATE-SIZE Suncoast Chemicals 205 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beneva Lakes 3,238 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Butterfly- Lakewood Ranch 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Connexis Physicians 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Treasures Thrift Shop II 2,476 FTE
NAT-TCR NY0515CN4 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Jasper County REMC Headquarters 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Inn At The Commons 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 50105 - Capstone Home Depot Rdc Mccalla 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 102925 - Boeing Factory Transformation 205 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meijer 267 205 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston Office 205 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avexis - Libertyville 205 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.