Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade · Minnesota

Avtec Finishing Systems, Inc.

New Hope, MN · ~132 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Avtec Finishing Systems, Inc. runs at 154% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Avtec Finishing Systems, Inc.: 5.1 TCR = 154% of Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Avtec Finishing Systems, Inc. safety composite

Avtec Finishing Systems, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Avtec Finishing Systems, Inc.: 4.0 → 4.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 8.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.87× in 2022

Avtec Finishing Systems, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.4 from 4.0 in 2016 to 4.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · New Hope, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 154% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #16/29
  • PHOTO Klein Plating Works
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Klein Plating Works (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Avtec Finishing Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Avtec Finishing Systems, Inc. averages 5.1 TCR (154% of the Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Avtec Finishing Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=8.5 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=6.8 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=4.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Avtec Finishing Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

585 Anodizing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 29 Anodizing metals and metal pro employers in Minnesota.

Avtec Finishing Systems, Inc. (132 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Avtec Finishing Systems, Inc.
Avtec Finishing Systems, Inc. (132 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Avtec Finishing Systems, Inc. has more employees than the Anodizing metals and metal products for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.4 4.4 5 0 0
2021 6.2 3.6 5 2 0
2020 6.8 3.9 5 2 0
2019 5.5 4.6 5 1 0
2018 0.1 0.1 5 0 0
2017 8.5 4.3 9 1 0
2016 4.0 2.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · MN · New Hope

585 Anodizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 95 employers in New Hope, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Klein Plating Works 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR nVent (ERICO International Corporation) - EAN 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elkhart Plating 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toledo Assembly 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lake Country Power 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Works 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Office 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamernick Decorating Center 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Therese of New Hope 391 FTE
CITY-NEAR Horwitz, Inc 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hope - Main Store 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Education Center 237 FTE
NAT-TCR California RDC 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR HG1005 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 405409-Medford or P&Dc 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 282580-Excelsior Springs Po 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Country Villa East Nursing Center 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Country Villa South Nursing Center 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3495-11DA635 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookmont Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.