Testing and measuring equipment, electrical (except automotive), merchant wholesalers · Louisiana

AWC, Baton Rouge Electrical Division

Baton Rouge, LA · ~22 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AWC, Baton Rouge Electrical Division runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Testing and measuring equipment, electrical (except automotive), merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade B.

AWC, Baton Rouge Electrical Division: 1.4 TCR = 63% of Testing and measuring equipment, electrical (except automotive), merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AWC, Baton Rouge Electrical Division safety composite

AWC, Baton Rouge Electrical Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2018→2020

AWC, Baton Rouge Electrical Division injury rate improved

AWC, Baton Rouge Electrical Division's TCR fell 4.2 from 4.2 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423830 · Baton Rouge, LA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.4 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/29
  • PHOTO Waco Warehouse
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Waco Warehouse (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

AWC, Baton Rouge Electrical Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AWC, Baton Rouge Electrical Division averages 1.4 TCR (63% of the Testing and measuring equipment, electrical (except automotive), merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AWC, Baton Rouge Electrical Division TCR series: 2018=4.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.2

Where AWC, Baton Rouge Electrical Division falls in its industry

911 Testing and measuring equipmen establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 29 Testing and measuring equipmen employers in Louisiana.

AWC, Baton Rouge Electrical Division (22 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate AWC, Baton Rouge Electrical Division
AWC, Baton Rouge Electrical Division (22 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5

AWC, Baton Rouge Electrical Division has fewer employees than the Testing and measuring equipment, electri median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.2 4.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423830 · LA · Baton Rouge

911 Testing and measuring equipment, electrical (except automotive), merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 781 employers in Baton Rouge, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Waco Warehouse 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nilfisk Brooklyn Park 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR JF Acquisitions, LLC d/b/a JF Petroleum Group: San Antonio, TX 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Van Air Inc. 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hatchery 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sea-Ropes 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-State Mechanical and Environmental Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE NOV Devin International 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR WEST REGION HEADQUARTERS 9,680 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brown & Root Industrial Services, LLC. 8,819 FTE
CITY-NEAR BATON ROUGE PACKERS 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baton Rouge 4,833 FTE
NAT-TCR BASF Elyria 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR James R. Glidewell Dental Ceramics - Mich 2144 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cs2 - Community Services, Employment & Training 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Grayslake Community High School #127 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Baxter Machine 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE BMC-Pierre 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Van Unen Miersma Propane 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hoilday Inn Express 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.