Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arkansas

Azalea Commons of Springdale, LLC

Springdale, AR · ~39 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Azalea Commons of Springdale, LLC runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Azalea Commons of Springdale, LLC: 1.9 TCR = 50% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Azalea Commons of Springdale, LLC safety composite

Azalea Commons of Springdale, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2021→2024

Azalea Commons of Springdale, LLC injury rate improved

Azalea Commons of Springdale, LLC's TCR fell 2.9 from 2.9 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=2.9 · 2022=2.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Springdale, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/51
  • PHOTO 6273_14728
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6273_14728 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Azalea Commons of Springdale, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Azalea Commons of Springdale, LLC averages 1.9 TCR (50% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Azalea Commons of Springdale, LLC TCR series: 2021=2.9 · 2022=2.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Azalea Commons of Springdale, LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 51 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arkansas.

Azalea Commons of Springdale, LLC (39 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Azalea Commons of Springdale, LLC
Azalea Commons of Springdale, LLC (39 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Azalea Commons of Springdale, LLC has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AR · Springdale

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 191 employers in Springdale, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6273_14728 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 62054 BRIGHTON GARDENS OF MOUNTAINSIDE 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Heritage at Delray 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Amberleigh 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Danville Hatchery 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Entergy Conway 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Batesville 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE BHGAR - Ozark - Cataberry Run (AR012) 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Springdale Processing 7,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR Further Processing 5,981 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Street Plant 1,224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Springdale AR Terminal 1,221 FTE
NAT-TCR Nastra Automotive Industries 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Americold Logistics, LLC: Savannah 1 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Coherent, Inc. Sunnyvale 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Materion - Technical Materials 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Total Packaging Services 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mazda of Fort Myers 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pallet Plant Pompano Bch FL - 308 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE CLF-Stable, LLC 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.