Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers · Texas

Azelis Americas CASE Garland

Garland, TX · ~36 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Azelis Americas CASE Garland runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade B.

Azelis Americas CASE Garland: 1.1 TCR = 52% of Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Azelis Americas CASE Garland safety composite

Azelis Americas CASE Garland scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Azelis Americas CASE Garland: 0.0 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 3.01× in 2023

Azelis Americas CASE Garland's TCR rose 3.4 from 0.0 in 2021 to 3.4 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 3.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424690 · Garland, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.1 · 52% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #37/101
  • PHOTO Houston Packaged Gas…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Houston Packaged Gas Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Azelis Americas CASE Garland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Azelis Americas CASE Garland averages 1.1 TCR (52% of the Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Azelis Americas CASE Garland TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.4 · BLS 2.2

Where Azelis Americas CASE Garland falls in its industry

766 Chemicals (except agriculture) establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 101 Chemicals (except agriculture) employers in Texas.

Azelis Americas CASE Garland (36 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Azelis Americas CASE Garland
Azelis Americas CASE Garland (36 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Azelis Americas CASE Garland has fewer employees than the Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., au median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424690 · TX · Garland

766 Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 316 employers in Garland, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Houston Packaged Gas Plant 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NSPEC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kent Distribution 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barentz North America, LLC. 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE FRONTIER FEED YARD 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paco Feedyard 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coyote Lake Feedyard Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services Waelder 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DDA2 1,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kraft Heinz Comany Garland 1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kraft Heinz 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osburn Contractors 933 FTE
NAT-TCR ServiceMaster Cleaning of Jackson, DBA as Warner Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR GreenBroz Inc 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hatzel & Buehler Inc. - Piketon 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR King County Assessor's Office 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Philadelphia Svc Bldg 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milton Ofc and Svc Ctr 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Becker Showroom 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Hinz Company, Inc. 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.