Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Wisconsin

Azura Memory Care of Kenosha

Kenosha, WI · ~27 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Azura Memory Care of Kenosha runs at 453% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Azura Memory Care of Kenosha: 17.2 TCR = 453% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Azura Memory Care of Kenosha safety composite

Azura Memory Care of Kenosha scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−30.2

2016→2021

Azura Memory Care of Kenosha injury rate improved

Azura Memory Care of Kenosha's TCR fell 30.2 from 38.4 in 2016 to 8.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 38.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=38.4 · 2018=13.7 · 2020=8.5 · 2021=8.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Kenosha, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.2 · 453% of ind

  • DART 8.2 DART
  • RANK #161/171
  • PHOTO Inn at Ironwood
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Inn at Ironwood (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Azura Memory Care of Kenosha in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Azura Memory Care of Kenosha averages 17.2 TCR (453% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Azura Memory Care of Kenosha TCR series: 2016=38.4 · 2018=13.7 · 2020=8.5 · 2021=8.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Azura Memory Care of Kenosha falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #161 safest of 171 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Azura Memory Care of Kenosha (27 employees, TCR 17.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Azura Memory Care of Kenosha
Azura Memory Care of Kenosha (27 employees, TCR 17.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Azura Memory Care of Kenosha has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 8.2 8.2 2 0 0
2020 8.5 8.5 2 0 0
2018 13.7 0.0 4 0 0
2016 38.4 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · WI · Kenosha

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 178 employers in Kenosha, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Inn at Ironwood 17.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silverado Highland Park - 244 17.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elegance at Dublin 17.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anthem Littleton Managment, LLC 17.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lake Mills Corporate Office 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chilton Dairy, LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooperative Resources International - Distribution Center 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steam Service Headquarters 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MKE1 3,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MKE1 2,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora Medical Center Kenosha 2,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : MKE5 1,671 FTE
NAT-TCR 613 Long Beach Outlet 17.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Telecable Inc 17.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 555 Mowry Ave 17.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 2039-Rancho Cucamonga 17.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Continental Office PA 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cold Storage Solutions I Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Batkowski Life Safety Corp. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boda Plumbing, INC 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.