Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade · Mississippi

AZZ Galvanizing - Moss Point

Moss Point, MS · ~29 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AZZ Galvanizing - Moss Point runs at 227% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

AZZ Galvanizing - Moss Point: 7.5 TCR = 227% of Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AZZ Galvanizing - Moss Point safety composite

AZZ Galvanizing - Moss Point scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

AZZ Galvanizing - Moss Point held a steady TCR band

AZZ Galvanizing - Moss Point's TCR held near 0.1 from 6.9 in 2017 to 7.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 14.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.9 · 2018=13.9 · 2019=14.5 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=7.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Moss Point, MS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.5 · 227% of ind

  • DART 7.0 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO Calibre, Inc. - Hwy.…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Calibre, Inc. - Hwy. W Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

AZZ Galvanizing - Moss Point in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AZZ Galvanizing - Moss Point averages 7.5 TCR (227% of the Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AZZ Galvanizing - Moss Point TCR series: 2017=6.9 · 2018=13.9 · 2019=14.5 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=7 · BLS 3.3

Where AZZ Galvanizing - Moss Point falls in its industry

646 Hot dip galvanizing metals and establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Hot dip galvanizing metals and employers in Mississippi.

AZZ Galvanizing - Moss Point (29 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate AZZ Galvanizing - Moss Point
AZZ Galvanizing - Moss Point (29 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

AZZ Galvanizing - Moss Point has fewer employees than the Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal pro median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.0 7.0 3 0 0
2022 4.5 2.3 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.6 5.6 2 0 0
2019 14.5 9.7 6 0 0
2018 13.9 11.6 6 0 0
2017 6.9 6.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · MS · Moss Point

646 Hot dip galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 32 employers in Moss Point, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Calibre, Inc. - Hwy. W Facility 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Household Utilities Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heresite Protective Coatings LLC 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR AZZ Galvanizing - Reno, LLC 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amick Farms, LLC MS Hatchery 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delta Tree Service Inc 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cross Water, LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Entergy Choctaw County Generation Station 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant Victor Daniel 221 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant Victor Daniel MPC1820 201 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant Daniel 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Floore Industrial Contractors, Inc. 171 FTE
NAT-TCR Department of Oregon State Police 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR RRSC Baltimore/WA Market 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Us Autoforce Mendota Heights 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mestek Machinery 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE McCabe's Landscape Construction 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill Redwood Empire - StonyPoint 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cotton Gin 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE GAT 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.