Electronic test equipment for testing electrical characteristics manufacturing · California

B & K Precision Corporation

Yorba Linda, CA · ~48 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

B & K Precision Corporation runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electronic test equipment for testing electrical characteristics manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

B & K Precision Corporation: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Electronic test equipment for testing electrical characteristics manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

B & K Precision Corporation safety composite

B & K Precision Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

B & K Precision Corporation held a steady TCR band

B & K Precision Corporation's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334515 · Yorba Linda, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/35
  • PHOTO Tektronix, Inc (39)
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tektronix, Inc (39) (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

B & K Precision Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows B & K Precision Corporation averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Electronic test equipment for testing electrical characteristics manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

B & K Precision Corporation TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where B & K Precision Corporation falls in its industry

125 Electronic test equipment for establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 35 Electronic test equipment for employers in California.

B & K Precision Corporation (48 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate B & K Precision Corporation
B & K Precision Corporation (48 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9

B & K Precision Corporation has fewer employees than the Electronic test equipment for testing el median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334515 · CA · Yorba Linda

125 Electronic test equipment for testing electrical characteristics manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 53 employers in Yorba Linda, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tektronix, Inc (39) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Landis+Gyr Alpharetta GA 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tempo Communications, Inc. 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elster Solutions LLC (Honeywell) 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE ARVIN PRODUCTION & ADMIN 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rava Business Park 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Guerrero Transportation & Contracting Inc 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE VPS, Inc 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 803 917 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0445 - YORBA LINDA CA WHSE 309 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1697_3366 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vyaire Medical - Yorba Linda 218 FTE
NAT-TCR Point32Health Quincy 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Point32Health Providence 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Creekside 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Koeze Company 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trade Access 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE S & B Finishing Co Inc 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Z-Tech Insulation, Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harwood 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.