CB (citizens band) radios manufacturing · New Jersey

BAE Systems Electronic Systems WNJ

Wayne, NJ · ~742 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BAE Systems Electronic Systems WNJ runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical CB (citizens band) radios manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

BAE Systems Electronic Systems WNJ: 0.6 TCR = 17% of CB (citizens band) radios manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BAE Systems Electronic Systems WNJ safety composite

BAE Systems Electronic Systems WNJ scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

BAE Systems Electronic Systems WNJ held a steady TCR band

BAE Systems Electronic Systems WNJ's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.3 in 2016 to 0.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.3 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334220 · Wayne, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO NGSP-AZ12
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~742 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NGSP-AZ12 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

BAE Systems Electronic Systems WNJ in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BAE Systems Electronic Systems WNJ averages 0.6 TCR (17% of the CB (citizens band) radios manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BAE Systems Electronic Systems WNJ TCR series: 2016=0.3 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=0.1 · 2024=0.1 · BLS 3.3

Where BAE Systems Electronic Systems WNJ falls in its industry

247 CB (citizens band) radios manu establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 CB (citizens band) radios manu employers in New Jersey.

BAE Systems Electronic Systems WNJ (742 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate BAE Systems Electronic Systems WNJ
BAE Systems Electronic Systems WNJ (742 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1

BAE Systems Electronic Systems WNJ has more employees than the CB (citizens band) radios manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.1 0.1 2 0 0
2023 0.1 0.1 0 1 0
2022 1.6 1.5 1 12 0
2021 0.9 0.5 1 6 0
2020 0.5 0.5 3 1 0
2019 0.6 0.2 3 2 0
2018 0.5 0.0 2 2 0
2017 0.3 0.0 0 2 0
2016 0.3 0.2 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334220 · NJ · Wayne

247 CB (citizens band) radios manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 120 employers in Wayne, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NGSP-AZ12 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ARRIS 17 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA159 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ARRIS 2 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Roche Molecular Systems Branchburg Site 742 FTE
STATE-SIZE HelloFresh NJ (Distribution Center) 744 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6458-ZSEC 737 FTE
STATE-SIZE PRMSNJ60 737 FTE
CITY-NEAR main facility 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Getinge USA Sales, LLC - One Geoffrey Way 1,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR DSV Solutions WYN 847 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6164-ST JOSEPH S WAYNE HOSPITAL 737 FTE
NAT-TCR BAE Systems Electronic Systems MER 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Hoosier Company, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR O&M CMI Services 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR San Antonio 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Boyd Gaming Corporate 742 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Pipeline Solutions, LLC 742 FTE
NAT-SIZE AstraZeneca - Mt.Vernon 742 FTE
NAT-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 319 742 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.