Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale · North Carolina

Bakkavor Charlotte

Charlotte, NC · ~264 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.1
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bakkavor Charlotte runs at 368% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale workplace, earning a grade F.

Bakkavor Charlotte: 15.1 TCR = 368% of Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS 4.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bakkavor Charlotte safety composite

Bakkavor Charlotte scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.8

2016→2020

Bakkavor Charlotte injury rate improved

Bakkavor Charlotte's TCR fell 10.8 from 20.5 in 2016 to 9.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 22.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=20.5 · 2017=22.0 · 2018=11.7 · 2019=11.5 · 2020=9.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311991 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 15.1 · 368% of ind

  • DART 9.7 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO CookUnity, Inc
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 176 inj
  • SIZE ~264 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CookUnity, Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Bakkavor Charlotte in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bakkavor Charlotte averages 15.1 TCR (368% of the Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bakkavor Charlotte TCR series: 2016=20.5 · 2017=22 · 2018=11.7 · 2019=11.5 · 2020=9.7 · BLS 4.1

Where Bakkavor Charlotte falls in its industry

376 Food, prepared, perishable, pa establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Food, prepared, perishable, pa employers in North Carolina.

Bakkavor Charlotte (264 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bakkavor Charlotte
Bakkavor Charlotte (264 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Bakkavor Charlotte has more employees than the Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 9.7 9.7 24 0 0
2019 11.5 10.5 33 0 0
2018 11.7 10.5 30 1 0
2017 22.0 19.5 43 0 0
2016 20.5 18.4 46 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311991 · NC · Charlotte

376 Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CookUnity, Inc 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Isabelles Kitchen Inc 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Kitchen 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR John's Genova Delicatessen, Inc. 15.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lennar Charlotte/Greenville 264 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brakebush Mocksville 264 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bekaert Deslee 264 FTE
STATE-SIZE K-Flex USA LLC 264 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Lehigh Center 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bickford of Peoria 1 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Tokyo Central & Main - Pacific & Ck 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Shopko Hometown #761 (Newcastle, WY) 15.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Mercy Homecare 264 FTE
NAT-SIZE Conklin DC 264 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nestle Purina Petcare - Saint Joseph 264 FTE
NAT-SIZE 36 Bazeberry 264 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.