Sash, door and window, metal, manufacturing · South Dakota

Balance Systems Inc

Sioux Falls, SD · ~233 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Balance Systems Inc runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Sash, door and window, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Balance Systems Inc: 2.3 TCR = 68% of Sash, door and window, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Balance Systems Inc safety composite

Balance Systems Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2023

Balance Systems Inc injury rate improved

Balance Systems Inc's TCR fell 1.4 from 3.2 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.2 · 2017=2.8 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332321 · Sioux Falls, SD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO DBCI-Douglasville
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~233 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DBCI-Douglasville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Balance Systems Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Balance Systems Inc averages 2.3 TCR (68% of the Sash, door and window, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Balance Systems Inc TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2017=2.8 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Balance Systems Inc falls in its industry

515 Sash, door and window, metal, establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Sash, door and window, metal, employers in South Dakota.

Balance Systems Inc (233 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Balance Systems Inc
Balance Systems Inc (233 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Balance Systems Inc has more employees than the Sash, door and window, metal, manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.8 0.9 4 0 0
2022 1.8 1.8 4 0 0
2021 1.9 1.0 4 0 0
2020 2.4 1.0 5 0 0
2019 1.8 1.4 4 0 0
2017 2.8 2.4 9 0 0
2016 3.2 2.4 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332321 · SD · Sioux Falls

515 Sash, door and window, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,778 rated employers in South Dakota with headcount on file · 542 employers in Sioux Falls, SD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DBCI-Douglasville 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main LLC - 02 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aluflam North America LLC 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MOG Deerfield Beach 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Watertown Plant 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manitou Group Yankton SD 234 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodland Cabinetry 232 FTE
STATE-SIZE 500187100 - UNIV. OF SOUTH DAKOTA 234 FTE
CITY-NEAR SD,Sioux Falls-Medical Center Campus-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 6,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR SD,SIOUX FALLS - Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 4,818 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smithfield Foods 3,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Avera McKennan Hospital 3,312 FTE
NAT-TCR Kerr Corporation 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR O'Connor Distributing- Three Lakes Division 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Richard E. Pierson Construction Co, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 3835 Main LLC 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alabama Specialty Products, Inc. 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fellowship Manor 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE NIBCO Blytheville 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indianapolis Region 233 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.