Commercial building construction · Arkansas

Baldwin and Shell Construction Company

Little Rock, AR · ~236 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Baldwin and Shell Construction Company runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial building construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Baldwin and Shell Construction Company: 0.8 TCR = 27% of Commercial building construction BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Baldwin and Shell Construction Company safety composite

Baldwin and Shell Construction Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2021→2022

Baldwin and Shell Construction Company injury rate improved

Baldwin and Shell Construction Company's TCR fell 0.8 from 1.2 in 2021 to 0.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.2 · 2022=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Little Rock, AR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/29
  • PHOTO C. R. Crawford Const…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~236 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C. R. Crawford Construction, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Baldwin and Shell Construction Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Baldwin and Shell Construction Company averages 0.8 TCR (27% of the Commercial building construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Baldwin and Shell Construction Company TCR series: 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.4 · BLS 2.9

Where Baldwin and Shell Construction Company falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 29 Commercial building constructi employers in Arkansas.

Baldwin and Shell Construction Company (236 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Baldwin and Shell Construction Company
Baldwin and Shell Construction Company (236 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Baldwin and Shell Construction Company has more employees than the Commercial building construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.2 1.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · AR · Little Rock

4,692 Commercial building construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 446 employers in Little Rock, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C. R. Crawford Construction, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR WDF Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commercial Team Construction LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lueder Construction Company 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE University of Arkansas for Med 236 FTE
STATE-SIZE Good Day Farm Arkansas 235 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pepper Source LTD. 237 FTE
STATE-SIZE 025-00409 237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arkansas Children's Hospital 3,946 FTE
CITY-NEAR LITCX0UPS LIT - UPS 3,415 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LIT1 2,510 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Medical Center - Little Rock 2,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Office and Shop, Rule Steel 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CDI Energy Products 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR ADS LLC - Huntsville 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Swisslog Logistics Inc. HQ 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Twin Marquis LLC. 236 FTE
NAT-SIZE Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc - Thomas Hill Energy Center 236 FTE
NAT-SIZE Standard Drywall, Inc. - Corona CA 236 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skender Construction LLC 236 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.