332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing · New York

Ball Beverage Pkg 155 Saratoga Springs

Saratoga Springs, NY · ~190 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ball Beverage Pkg 155 Saratoga Springs runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Ball Beverage Pkg 155 Saratoga Springs: 2.7 TCR = 81% of 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ball Beverage Pkg 155 Saratoga Springs safety composite

Ball Beverage Pkg 155 Saratoga Springs scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ball Beverage Pkg 155 Saratoga Springs: 1.0 → 1.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.56× in 2024

Ball Beverage Pkg 155 Saratoga Springs's TCR rose 0.5 from 1.0 in 2017 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332431 · Saratoga Springs, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 81% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #5/10
  • PHOTO Chestnut Hill Sonoc…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~190 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chestnut Hill Sonoco Metal Packing - D142 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Ball Beverage Pkg 155 Saratoga Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ball Beverage Pkg 155 Saratoga Springs averages 2.7 TCR (81% of the 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ball Beverage Pkg 155 Saratoga Springs TCR series: 2017=1 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=2.6 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=5 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Ball Beverage Pkg 155 Saratoga Springs falls in its industry

217 332431 Aluminum cans, light g establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 10 332431 Aluminum cans, light g employers in New York.

Ball Beverage Pkg 155 Saratoga Springs (190 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Ball Beverage Pkg 155 Saratoga Springs
Ball Beverage Pkg 155 Saratoga Springs (190 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Ball Beverage Pkg 155 Saratoga Springs has more employees than the 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 3 0 0
2023 5.0 2.0 5 5 0
2022 3.2 2.1 6 0 0
2020 2.6 2.1 5 0 0
2019 2.2 1.6 4 0 0
2018 3.2 2.7 5 1 0
2017 1.0 1.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332431 · NY · Saratoga Springs

217 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 69 employers in Saratoga Springs, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chestnut Hill Sonoco Metal Packing - D142 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maple Manufacturing LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ardagh Metal Packaging - Winston-Salem 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ardagh Metal Packaging - Fairfield 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lackawanna 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE TIME CAP LABS MANUFACTURING 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE 115 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR AIM Services INC 2,719 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saratoga Hospital 2,139 FTE
CITY-NEAR SARATOGA NY 561 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wesley Health Care Center, Inc. 494 FTE
NAT-TCR Brokerage 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR OMEGA 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Skyline Eagan 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR SAN-D 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main Location 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE MBM-10 Utah 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boise 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oak Crossing 190 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.