Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Kentucky

Barrington of Ft. Thomas

Ft. Thomas, KY · ~61 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Barrington of Ft. Thomas runs at 207% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Barrington of Ft. Thomas: 7.9 TCR = 207% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Barrington of Ft. Thomas safety composite

Barrington of Ft. Thomas scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Barrington of Ft. Thomas: 15.5 → 16.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 16.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.35× in 2023

Barrington of Ft. Thomas's TCR rose 1.2 from 15.5 in 2016 to 16.7 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Ft. Thomas, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.9 · 207% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #41/64
  • PHOTO Brookdale Vista Grande
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Vista Grande (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Barrington of Ft. Thomas in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Barrington of Ft. Thomas averages 7.9 TCR (207% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Barrington of Ft. Thomas TCR series: 2016=15.5 · 2019=10.5 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=16.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Barrington of Ft. Thomas falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 64 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Kentucky.

Barrington of Ft. Thomas (61 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Barrington of Ft. Thomas
Barrington of Ft. Thomas (61 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Barrington of Ft. Thomas has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 16.7 2.8 6 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.5 0.0 2 0 0
2019 10.5 5.2 4 0 0
2016 15.5 7.8 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · KY · Ft. Thomas

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 5 employers in Ft. Thomas, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Vista Grande 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anam Care II 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Estates of Danville 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bonaventure of Medford 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Paducah Rigging 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raatz Fence Company 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fordsville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Madison County Hall of Justice 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Elizabeth Healthcare Ft Thomas 851 FTE
CITY-NEAR Campbell County YMCA Branch 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR Highlandspring 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Head and Neck Surgery Associates 107 FTE
NAT-TCR UDNW 5002 (Ankeny - F) 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pierre Ramkota 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Boyne USA d/b/a Big Sky Resort 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Kenneth C. Wilson 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 3 Squares Restaurant 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern Mahaska Specialty Care 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indianapolis 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stepan Maywood 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.