Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work · Florida

Bates Electric Inc

Tampa, FL · ~168 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bates Electric Inc runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work workplace, earning a grade B.

Bates Electric Inc: 1.9 TCR = 68% of Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bates Electric Inc safety composite

Bates Electric Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2018→2024

Bates Electric Inc injury rate improved

Bates Electric Inc's TCR fell 4.8 from 4.8 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.8 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=0.6 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Tampa, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #83/275
  • PHOTO Pieper Houston Elect…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~168 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pieper Houston Electric, LP - Main Office - All Projects (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Bates Electric Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bates Electric Inc averages 1.9 TCR (68% of the Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bates Electric Inc TCR series: 2018=4.8 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=0.6 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Bates Electric Inc falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical, electrical wiring, establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #83 safest of 275 Electrical, electrical wiring, employers in Florida.

Bates Electric Inc (168 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bates Electric Inc
Bates Electric Inc (168 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Bates Electric Inc has more employees than the Electrical, electrical wiring, and low v median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2021 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2020 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2019 4.5 3.7 5 1 0
2018 4.8 2.7 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · FL · Tampa

4,550 Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pieper Houston Electric, LP - Main Office - All Projects 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TONY MILLER ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION, INC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Geary Electric Inc 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cresco Operations - Indiantown, FL 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crisdel Group INC 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Mechanical, LLC 168 FTE
STATE-SIZE T.G. Lee - Administration 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR Gaines County Harvesters, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Property Maintenance 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wat-Kem Mechanical, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR USA Custom Pad Corp 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fowler & Hammer, Inc. 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2036 - Benicia 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Horizon Services - HSS 168 FTE
NAT-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Temple 168 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.