Poultry slaughtering and processing · Arkansas

Batesville Processing

Name: Batesville Processing Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Batesville, AR · ~6,286 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.6
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Batesville Processing runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Poultry slaughtering and processing workplace, earning a grade B.

Batesville Processing: 2.6 TCR = 78% of Poultry slaughtering and processing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Batesville Processing safety composite

Batesville Processing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 2.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers
DART rate: D 1.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2021→2024

Batesville Processing injury rate improved

Batesville Processing's TCR fell 2.4 from 4.3 in 2021 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.3 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Batesville, AR AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 78% of ind

DART 1.5 DART
RANK #22/69
PHOTO OKC Processing Plant
BOOK 4y book
INJ 81 inj
SIZE ~6,286 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OKC Processing Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.6
OKC Processing

2.6
George's Harri

2.6
Petaluma Plant

2.6
Danville proce

2.6

What this shows Batesville Processing averages 2.6 TCR (78% of the Poultry slaughtering and processing BLS benchmark).

Batesville Processing TCR series: 2021=4.3 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Batesville Processing falls in its industry

509 Poultry slaughtering and proce establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 69 Poultry slaughtering and proce employers in Arkansas.

Batesville Processing (6,286 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Batesville Processing has more employees than the Poultry slaughtering and processing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2024	1.9	1.5	17	0
2023	2.1	1.0	16	2
2022	2.1	1.2	16	1
2021	4.3	2.8	32	2

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · AR · Batesville

509 Poultry slaughtering and processing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 57 employers in Batesville, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	OKC Processing Plant	OKLAHOMA CITY, OK	2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	George's Harrisonburg Processing Plant	HARRISONBURG, VA	2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Petaluma Plant	PETALUMA, CA	2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Danville processing plant	DANVILLE, AR	2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Further Processing	SPRINGDALE	5,981 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Rogers Processing	ROGERS	5,377 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Springdale Processing	SPRINGDALE	7,841 FTE
STATE-SIZE	AR-Fayetteville	FAYETTEVILLE	4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Peco Foods	Batesville	1,415 FTE
CITY-NEAR	White River Medical Center	Batesville	1,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Future Fuel Chemical Company	Batesville	477 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 119	Batesville	396 FTE
NAT-TCR	Philomath	Corvallis, OR	2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Sidney NE Car Shop	Sidney, NE	2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Maggio Data Corp	Hauppauge, NY	2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Fort Mill	Fort Mill, SC	2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Corporate Center	Des Moines, IA	6,292 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Louisville Jefferson Co Metro Gov't	Louisville, KY	6,303 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Florence	Florence, AL	6,258 FTE
NAT-SIZE	North Metro	Atlanta, GA	6,254 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.