Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing · Texas

Baumann Springs GP

Grand Prairie, TX · ~62 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Baumann Springs GP runs at 116% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Baumann Springs GP: 3.8 TCR = 116% of Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Baumann Springs GP safety composite

Baumann Springs GP scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.0

2022→2024

Baumann Springs GP injury rate improved

Baumann Springs GP's TCR fell 6.0 from 7.8 in 2022 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=7.8 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332613 · Grand Prairie, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 116% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #5/10
  • PHOTO Ark Technologies
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ark Technologies (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Baumann Springs GP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Baumann Springs GP averages 3.8 TCR (116% of the Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Baumann Springs GP TCR series: 2022=7.8 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Baumann Springs GP falls in its industry

189 Coiled springs (except clock, establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 10 Coiled springs (except clock, employers in Texas.

Baumann Springs GP (62 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Baumann Springs GP
Baumann Springs GP (62 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Baumann Springs GP has fewer employees than the Coiled springs (except clock, watch), li median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2023 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 7.8 3.9 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332613 · TX · Grand Prairie

189 Coiled springs (except clock, watch), light gauge, made from purchased wire or strip, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 405 employers in Grand Prairie, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ark Technologies 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sterling Spring LLC 65th 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Economy Spring 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baumann Springs FW 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE EP Energy - Eagle Ford (Dilley) 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Dog Drilling 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koserca Headquearters 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monahans 2790 South Wilma, Monahans, TX 79756 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Grand Prairie Campus (1435) 3,544 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poly-America, L.P. 2,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR Poly America 2,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inmar - 4355 Grand Prairie, TX 1,200 FTE
NAT-TCR Hoerr Construction, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR LOC/CMC (Minority Auto Handling) 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Facility Site Contractors, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Vienna Plant 47 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE RLG - Ample 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Drainage Products Inc. 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ben's Supercenter Inc 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Landis Express 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.