Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Virginia

Bay Aging

Urbanna, VA · ~290 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bay Aging runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Bay Aging: 3.4 TCR = 91% of Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bay Aging safety composite

Bay Aging scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2018→2024

Bay Aging injury rate improved

Bay Aging's TCR fell 1.9 from 4.3 in 2018 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.3 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Urbanna, VA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 91% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #6/28
  • PHOTO Altus Plus
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~290 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Altus Plus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Bay Aging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bay Aging averages 3.4 TCR (91% of the Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bay Aging TCR series: 2018=4.3 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Bay Aging falls in its industry

1,320 Companion services for disable establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 28 Companion services for disable employers in Virginia.

Bay Aging (290 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bay Aging
Bay Aging (290 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Bay Aging has more employees than the Companion services for disabled persons, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 0.4 6 0 0
2023 1.3 0.0 3 0 0
2022 1.2 0.0 3 0 0
2021 5.9 2.7 13 0 0
2020 5.6 1.9 9 0 0
2019 3.5 1.7 6 0 0
2018 4.3 2.1 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · VA · Urbanna

1,320 Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Altus Plus 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Washington 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grace Adult Day Services Chippewa Falls 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Forrester-Davis Development Center 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tindall Corporation - Virginia Division 290 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newport News Industrial- OIP 290 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1431 - Falls Church 290 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2762 290 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bethpage Camp Resort 35 FTE
NAT-TCR Twist Plant 6 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Gulf Machine Shop, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Washington State Department of Agriculture 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Precision Turbo and Engine 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Line Quest LLC 290 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sun Prairie Location 290 FTE
NAT-SIZE BSH Home Appliances Corporation - LaFollette 290 FTE
NAT-SIZE City Hall 290 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.