Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · California

Bay City Mechanical Inc.

Richmond, CA · ~279 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bay City Mechanical Inc. runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Bay City Mechanical Inc.: 2.7 TCR = 98% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bay City Mechanical Inc. safety composite

Bay City Mechanical Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bay City Mechanical Inc.: 0.8 → 4.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2023

Bay City Mechanical Inc.'s TCR rose 4.1 from 0.8 in 2020 to 4.9 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Richmond, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 98% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #212/594
  • PHOTO FRESH MEADOW CHILLER…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~279 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FRESH MEADOW CHILLER SERVICES, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Bay City Mechanical Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bay City Mechanical Inc. averages 2.7 TCR (98% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bay City Mechanical Inc. TCR series: 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=4.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Bay City Mechanical Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #212 safest of 594 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in California.

Bay City Mechanical Inc. (279 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bay City Mechanical Inc.
Bay City Mechanical Inc. (279 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Bay City Mechanical Inc. has more employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.9 1.8 5 3 0
2022 4.8 2.4 8 0 0
2021 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.8 0.4 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · CA · Richmond

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Richmond, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FRESH MEADOW CHILLER SERVICES, LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MK HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING, INC. 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakes Heating 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CoolSys C&I Albuquerque Service 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hanwha Qcells America Irvine Office 279 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pavement Recycling Systems, Inc. 279 FTE
STATE-SIZE BT San Francisco (Fremont) 279 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rich Products Santa Ana 279 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 134 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 635 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 147 2,859 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 105 2,724 FTE
NAT-TCR Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation - Elkton 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bristol Care Center 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR City Club at River Ranch 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Brandkamp Cabinets LLC 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Plant - El Dorado 279 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aero Metals, Inc 279 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heightened Security Inc 279 FTE
NAT-SIZE Louis D. Brandeis Hall of Justice 279 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.