Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) · Texas

Baytown, TX (Exxon)- In-Plant Services

Baytown, TX · ~35 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Baytown, TX (Exxon)- In-Plant Services runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) workplace, earning a grade A.

Baytown, TX (Exxon)- In-Plant Services: 1.1 TCR = 19% of Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Baytown, TX (Exxon)- In-Plant Services safety composite

Baytown, TX (Exxon)- In-Plant Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Baytown, TX (Exxon)- In-Plant Services: 0.0 → 2.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.2 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2024

Baytown, TX (Exxon)- In-Plant Services's TCR rose 2.2 from 0.0 in 2023 to 2.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493190 · Baytown, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 19% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #25/76
  • PHOTO BOSTCO
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BOSTCO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Baytown, TX (Exxon)- In-Plant Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Baytown, TX (Exxon)- In-Plant Services averages 1.1 TCR (19% of the Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Baytown, TX (Exxon)- In-Plant Services TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 5.8

Where Baytown, TX (Exxon)- In-Plant Services falls in its industry

453 Warehousing (except farm produ establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 76 Warehousing (except farm produ employers in Texas.

Baytown, TX (Exxon)- In-Plant Services (35 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Baytown, TX (Exxon)- In-Plant Services
Baytown, TX (Exxon)- In-Plant Services (35 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Baytown, TX (Exxon)- In-Plant Services has fewer employees than the Warehousing (except farm products, gener median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493190 · TX · Baytown

453 Warehousing (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 247 employers in Baytown, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BOSTCO 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Long Beach Terminals 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fluor Federal Petroleum Operations - Bryan Mound 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ashville B294 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southwest Feedyard 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE CDF Dairy 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. - Marion, TX 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Growers Select Produce, Inc. 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR North American Growth Olefins Recovery Project 2,988 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Baytown Hospital 1,920 FTE
CITY-NEAR ExxonMobil Baytown Refinery 1,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 7042 1,288 FTE
NAT-TCR STR0253 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mr. Crane, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR McKeesport 10192 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Absolute Pharmacy, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE CA-EEC-Irwindale 6090 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE CA-Vincent Substation 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Pipe & Supply, LLC 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Philadelphia Distilling 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.