Cruise control mechanisms, electronic, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · New York

BCS Access Systems US, LLC

Auburn, NY · ~211 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BCS Access Systems US, LLC runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cruise control mechanisms, electronic, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

BCS Access Systems US, LLC: 1.6 TCR = 29% of Cruise control mechanisms, electronic, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BCS Access Systems US, LLC safety composite

BCS Access Systems US, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2017→2020

BCS Access Systems US, LLC injury rate improved

BCS Access Systems US, LLC's TCR fell 0.8 from 0.8 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.8 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336320 · Auburn, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Grote Industries
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~211 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Grote Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

BCS Access Systems US, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BCS Access Systems US, LLC averages 1.6 TCR (29% of the Cruise control mechanisms, electronic, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BCS Access Systems US, LLC TCR series: 2017=0.8 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=0 · BLS 5.4

Where BCS Access Systems US, LLC falls in its industry

216 Cruise control mechanisms, ele establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Cruise control mechanisms, ele employers in New York.

BCS Access Systems US, LLC (211 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate BCS Access Systems US, LLC
BCS Access Systems US, LLC (211 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 1.9

BCS Access Systems US, LLC has more employees than the Cruise control mechanisms, electronic, a median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.3 2.0 5 0 0
2018 2.2 1.5 3 0 0
2017 0.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336320 · NY · Auburn

216 Cruise control mechanisms, electronic, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 92 employers in Auburn, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Grote Industries 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Standard Motor Products Greenville Operations 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Draexlmaier Automotive - 285 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR AmTech, LLC 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Island Architectural Woodwork, Inc. 211 FTE
STATE-SIZE Precision Valve & Automation INC 211 FTE
STATE-SIZE Candlelight Cabinetry, Inc. 211 FTE
STATE-SIZE EvensonBest LLC 211 FTE
CITY-NEAR Auburn Community Hospital 725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Commons St Anthony 513 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Auburn 038 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1830 331 FTE
NAT-TCR Caviness Amarillo 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Parsec Jax FEC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HG004 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyde Condo Association 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Firstenburg Community Center 211 FTE
NAT-SIZE KGP New Century 500 211 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : IAD - Washington 211 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : TPA - Tampa 211 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.